Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)
Viewing all 10043 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: No duplicate notifications allow

December 24, 2015, 7:32 pm
$
0
0

Better syntax for the purpose (user-exit QQMA0014)

DATA: lv_qmnum TYPE qmnum.
CLEAR lv_qmnum.
IF sy-tcode = 'IW21' AND i_viqmel-qmart = 'M2'.
   SELECT SINGLE qmnum FROM viqmel INTO lv_qmnum
     WHERE equnr = i_viqmel-equnr AND qmart = 'M2' AND phase IN ('1', '3') .
   IF lv_qmnum IS NOT INITIAL.
     MESSAGE 'There are open notifications on this Equipment !' TYPE 'I'.
     RAISE exit_from_save.
   ENDIF.
ENDIF.

 

Though this is an old and closed discussion, felt like giving an improvised code for the purpose benefiting the solution searching members.

 

Thank you

KJogeswaraRao

↧
Search

Re: Unprocessed future change recs for order XXXXX prevent del. flag/completion

December 24, 2015, 7:49 pm
↧
↧

Re: Error in MO - Performance based stretegy Plan

December 24, 2015, 9:51 pm
$
0
0

Perhaps you need to give Strategy/Package related screen-shots too. (IP11)

↧

Re: How to put the valuation type Broken under restricted stock?

December 24, 2015, 7:40 pm
$
0
0

Sally,

I just recollected that before exploring the Automation of desired Goods movement, we should look into the possibility of posting it to Restricted stock, because, as I initially mentioned *For non-batch manged stocks you can not have Restricted type stocks.


At the same time you can move it to Blocked stock without any issues.


So please verify in those lines.

 

Regards

KJogeswaraRao

↧

Re: Error in MO - Performance based stretegy Plan

December 24, 2015, 10:29 pm
$
0
0

Dear,

 

Could you kindly show the scheduling parameters(Scheduling period and Call horizon) of maintenance plan and IP11 package sequence with respect to running hrs?

 

What did you choose the start counter while scheduling maintenance plan in IP10?

 

Regards,

pardhu

↧
↧

Re: Object list in maintenance order

December 25, 2015, 3:13 am
$
0
0

You can use customer exit IWO10027 to distribute the order costs proportionately to

the objects in the object list. . Customer Exits offer the option of enhancing the SAP

system without making any modifications.

 

-Linganna Katigiri

↧

Re: User-exits for componentes not triggered when creating WO by reference (IW31)

December 25, 2015, 9:35 am
$
0
0

We have finally discarded the use of user-exits to meet the requiremente: as the WO are copied by reference, the user should check (by clicking on the "General" button within the "components" tab) every single one of the components in order to trigger the user-exit.

Obviously, that is not feasible as some WOs include dozens of components.

 

At last, we have included the corresponding logic in an enhancement point of the standard FM that copies the components when a WO is created by reference through IW31.

 

Thanks and best regards,

J

↧

Issue with maint. plan no range continuity..

December 26, 2015, 1:43 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have a issue regarding maintenance plan number range. I shocked after seeing that number range is going to reversal.Here I started to create a maintenance plan with 10000371 and next was 10000372. After that when user create new maintenance plan that is started from 10000364 10000365 so on while these number has skipped.

 

What are the reason behind this I am unable to catch. Can internal number range go back side or reverse.

 

Untitled.jpg

 

Thanks

 

Regards

Gaurav Solanki

↧
Search

Re: Issue with maint. plan no range continuity..

December 26, 2015, 3:21 am
$
0
0

Hello Gaurav,

Below is the screen from the tcode SNRO displayed with value MPLA_NR  in the object field (Maintenance plan). See the Buffer value given by standard setting. It is 10.

Capture.JPG

 

What does this mean is:

You need not get consecutive numbers for the Maintenance plans. It is same with all Objects like Notifications, Orders etc. The reason for this arrangment in PRD server is, you have different servers in PRD. This buffer helps to reduce response time in alloting a number when the request goes to a particular server.  If you set this buffer value to '1', you will get numbers in sequence, but the response time for creation of a plan will be enormously high.

 

If you observe closely it might be happening with your Notifications (buffer value is 10), Orders (buffer value is 20) etc etc. As I mentioned this the case with PRD where many servers are there. In Quality and DEV it will not be the case where the landscape has gor only one server for each. And in PRD the skipped numbers are not lost, they will be filled up subsequently.

 

So this is quite normal


Regards

KJogeswaraRao

↧
↧

Re: Unprocessed future change recs for order XXXXX prevent del. flag/completion

December 26, 2015, 5:15 am
↧

Re: How to put the valuation type Broken under restricted stock?

December 26, 2015, 5:57 am
$
0
0

Sally,

 

There are a few options here using Inventory Management only (not WM):

  1. Move the broken stock to a different storage location that cannot be used
  2. Move the broken stock into unrestricted as normal, then move to another stock segment e.g.blocked

 

I would suggest you talk to you MM Team to see what they advise.

 

PeteA

↧

Re: Unable to schedule Work Orders on public Holiday

December 26, 2015, 6:00 am
$
0
0

Also check the factory calendar in the following:

  • Work centre
  • Order header
  • Maintenance plan

 

PeteA

↧

Re: Does a Work order not support Configurable Materials?

December 26, 2015, 6:04 am
↧
↧

Re: posting transfer for subcontracting stock on PM order

December 26, 2015, 7:41 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I think, Mr.Hossam is referring to below...

 

Create PM refurbishment (PM04) order with control key PM02, where the component will be sent to vendor for refurbishment, which should be captured in PR from PM order as Item Cat "L" ( also services as different line item with control key PM03 with AAC as "F" & "D")

 

Thanks,

Ravi

↧

Re: Requirement Assignment tab in Maintenance order Screen

December 27, 2015, 4:22 am
$
0
0

Hi Jogeswara

      Thanks you for your quick response, all i get when click on the Internal i got the same screen 125.png

Thanks

↧
Search

Re: IW3M - Order Type into ALV

December 28, 2015, 3:43 am
$
0
0

Thanks you both Jogeswara & Saurabh

 

Ashok

↧

Re: Shift management in PM workcentre

December 28, 2015, 3:41 am
$
0
0

Hi Faizan,

 

Just a thought.....

 

Seems your plant is running 24/7 & workers are also available for 24/7 through 3 shifts.

Lets take an example of MECHANIC workers who are available across 3 shifts in a day.


We can maintain a single Work center for MECHANIC by mentioning 24 HR total operating time. Create Personnel numbers for all the mechanic workers & assign them to MECHANIC work center.

With this way, you can assign the respective person to the maintenance operations in an Order depends on the availability.

 

Else. you can create 3 different work centers for 3 shifts as well.....

 

This you can take as work around, lets wait for others to add their opinions...

 

Thanks.

 

Amol

↧
↧

Re: How to control Actual cost in Work Order with limited a certain value

December 28, 2015, 3:56 am
↧

Re: Requirement Assignment tab in Maintenance order Screen

December 28, 2015, 3:57 am
$
0
0

Hi Saurabh

    Thank you for your quick response, I have define capacities and scheduling but i am facing the same issue, Would you please specify the data needed to get the assignment tab because I found that it apply on specific order type not all and in case of order type with different view profile it don't apply

Thanks

↧

Re: How to control Actual cost in Work Order with limited a certain value

December 28, 2015, 3:38 am
$
0
0

thanks for the reply and yes they are helpful i will sit with my Tech team on this and look for the realistic data with your suggestions.

 

thanks again but one more requirement from Client is that every time the confirmations are posted on the WO the Actual cost should be controlled and it should not be beyond the Planned costs of that WO.

 

suppose Planned cost of WO is 1000 and my confirmations has reached so for with an actual cost of 900 then it should trigger message stating we are about to corss the Planned cost of the WO and if the last confirmation is exceeding the 1000 then it will send message for the manager for further or it should limit the end user not to post that last confirmation(goods issues or PR request raise) with out any approval.

 

please help me on this.

↧
Viewing all 10043 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>