Greetings Jogeswara, Tamaki,
I think the question relates to Mr Tamaki requiring more fields on the Operation, than the User Field Key allows.
Mr Tamaki, I suggest these threads on the SCN for more info:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3476247 answer by Bijendra Som
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3302590
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3224787
Hello Tamaki,
I missed the exact requirement. You need more fields. I recall there are no fully answered or documented posts on this requirement. Also there seems to be no user-exits for this. Then it becomes a deep technical job involving implicit enhancements. Also we need to find some BADI's. I feel not an easy one.
But interestingly, someone says, he achieved this via user exit IWO10018 which generally understood to be for Order Header level additional fields. Go through this post in detail and the discussion between Pete and the author. I feel valuable information is there for your requirement. Addition user field for work order operations
Also related link (once you achieve these fields)
PM -order operations - customer-fields
Regards
KJogeswaraRao
Hello,
Please how we can do to manage the priority of order preventive ?
Regards,
Not sure I'm getting your question, but the priority you enter on a maintenance item is the one that is transferred to an order when it is created by scheduling the plan.
Paul
Hello Sine,
One known application of Priority type is to adjust the Basic Start and Finish Date and Times as per your logic specified in include ZXWOCU09 (user-exit IWO10012) .
Sample code:
IF CAUFVD_IMP-PRIOK = '1'.
GSTRP = SY-DATUM.
GSUZP = SY-UZEIT.
GLTRP = GSTRP + 1.
GLUZP = '240000'.
ENDIF.
What this does is, as soon as you select Priority '1' in the Priority field of the PM Order, the date time fields Basic Start /Finish change automatically to the above given values.
GSTRP - Basic Start date
GSUZP - Basic Start time
GLTRP - Basic Finish date and
GLUZP - Basic Finish Time
The logics for the above values can change from user to user. For example, someone has a requirement of these values to be determined according to the ABC indicators of Technical object. See this discussion. PM order priority depending on ABC indicator from reference object?
KJogeswaraRao
Hello,
I have a list of user names, I need to pull from which plant they belong to. Can any one please let me know which table I need to use?
Thanks In Advance
Greetings Experts, Gurus and SAP Sages!
I am looking into a particular requirement of adding an additional field (Person Responsible i.e. the PARNR Partner Function in the Order header) to be available for mass change.
Initially, my idea was that a Z-solution would have to be developed as an enhancement to IW38 / IW37N t-codes, possibly utilizing the FM BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN& structure BAPI_ALM_ORDER_PARTN_MUL_UP - of course, leading to all sorts of interesting questions, such as the authorization checks on I_MASS, search help, input checks, error handling etc., the alternative being to leverage the standard Mass Change functionality available through the EA-PLM extension.
I have not found relevant Notes, but an investigation of this and other angles on SCN revealed these pieces of information:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3197554
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1514434
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3577958
Mr Pete Atkin mentioned that they have also had to develop a solution, Mr Shiba Mishra revealed that his had been the subject of a SAP customer connection case, and Mr Paul Meehan stated that there are certain structures that can be extended to make the mass change of additional fields possible.
I have looked up these structures and some seem to have been updated recently in our system (we're on EHP7):
IWOS_MASSCHG_HEADER Last changed on/by SAP 24.05.2015
IWOS_MASSCHG_CONTROL Last changed on/by SAP 15.06.2005
IWOS_MASSCHG_LOCATION Last changed on/by SAP 14.10.2014
IWOS_MASSCHG_ADDATA Last changed on/by SAP 26.11.2008
IWOS_MASSCHG_PMSDO Last changed on/by SAP 20.09.2006
All of those structures are in the "Cannot be enhanced" category. Some structures seem to have been be updated recently, and may be updated in the future. Changing these structures would be a divergence from the standard and cause issues during later upgrades.
So what is the latest on this?
Is it going to be part of a future standard after upgrade?
Have you had similar solutions developed?
Or do you have some experience to share with changing these structures and supporting such a modification throughout the upgrades?
Do you at all condone such modification, or would rather go with a customization?
There are lots of discussion already exist regarding the same. You can use different price control for different valuation type as per your requirement.
If your system is considering the price control V, then check the default value in the IMG path OLMW-Define Price Control for Material Types.
Added the same field in structure and tried. Popup is showing but even after entering the data in the field and doing techo the error is showing.
Ramesh
Dear,
I hope it is possible to set mandatory of custom filed in screen variant using transaction SHD0.
Regards,
Pardhu
I do not think with this much inputs you would get any meaningful replies.
Dear Gurus,
In IA01 , Equipment task list, in operation long text is up to 40 charcter, but i want to increase length . because the reamianing space will be empty and it is giong to next line. i want increase the charcter length up to 72 .
please help me to slove this issue
Gurus,
I have a requirement to set automatic generation of PM notifications when the counter reading posted are out side the normal range. My client wants to be posting oil analysis results in SAP so that a notification is automatically created whenever the posting is outside the agreed range. Kindly assist on which configuration changes i need to do to achieve this
Thanks in anticipation
Greetings Mutale,
Clarification - you use the word "counter" but in fact, the question is about Measuring Points that are not counters, rather, you want to have an event when the reading is above or below the set limits?
You will have to utilize User Exit IMRC0001
See the thread http://scn.sap.com/thread/1626328
Greetings Vinay,
You could use t-code OP04 or the following path in IMG:
SPRO > Production > Basic Data > Routing > Control Data > Define Line Length for Long Texts
For the Application "I" - Maintenance task lists.You may input 72 characters.
Hello,
Please is that there is a possibility that the priority in inside the order influence on dates ?
Regards,
A quick search found this thread, addressing the same question:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1972805
Paul
Finally we settled for a module-pool program, which is nothing but a chain of Screen-programs giving a shape to a customized SAP EASY ACCESS sort of screen having features like:
-Automatic Plant Section Planner Group and Work Center fields defaulting according to user.
-Text boxes to record Safety talk, Tools handover, Instructions to next shift
-Plant structure button to take the user directly to his equipment tree from where he/she creates Notifications and Orders.
-Easy access to his/her Measuring point entrylists and recording the values.
-And several such.
It was mainly divided into 2 sections:
Data Entry and
Data Retrieval
In the Data Retrieval section we listed all useful standard and Z tcodes.
The final outcome of Shift activities are collected into a smartform report for which a button was given named 'Shift Report'
so we used full ABAP for developing this logbook.
KJogeswaraRao
Yes,
But the values you want to give to the Date, Time fields should be through a logic. That will be another code. For example, suppose you decided Basic start date on some criteria. And then you decided the start time on some other criteria. And then decided the difference between the Start and Finish Date and Times depending upon the priority you selected. So this code is to be developed by your ABAPer.