Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)
Viewing all 10043 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Over lapping of operations should not be allowed

$
0
0

Hello Jogeswara Rao Sir,


Please help.


Regards,

Smart Kumar


Validation for multiple conditions in Notifications

$
0
0

Hi,

was going through this forum for a solution on a requirement as below:

I need a validation such that a user would not be allowed to NOCO a notification of a particular type (say for example M2 notification type) unless Cause  is populated. But if the user tries just saving the notification it should allow. Only when user tries NOCO it should throw error.

Can you please help with solution?

I tried the configuration route by making  VIQMUR-URGRP required with activity category 'V' and notification type 'M2' . But this does not help since the required setting is affecting all the notification types.

 

Thanks In advance.

 

Regards

Shanmugasundaram

Re: Over lapping of operations should not be allowed

$
0
0

Hello Smart,

 

If the requirement is:

'Prevent overlap between the  durations of Basic Start and End Date any two work orders' then I'll try to derive the solution. (For solution I do not see any involvement of Capacity Leveling.)


Regards

KJogeswaraRao

Re: Cutover planning in SAP EAM

$
0
0

Hello Jogeswara.

 

Very useful set of links. Thank you.

 

M

Re: Cutover planning in SAP EAM

$
0
0

Thank you for the good advices!

 

M.

Re: Validation for multiple conditions in Notifications

$
0
0

Dear Jogeswara

Thanks for the solution. Would test and get back.

 

Regards

Shanmugasundaram R

Re: Need User Manual of Refurbishment process

$
0
0

Hi Rao Sir.

 

On more confusion kindly suggest...Suppose I have a spare part X which is already installed in equipment when this X spare part goes in breakdown and feel that we can do refurbish of this X.

 

Then the confusion is that how to move that spare part in stock at damaged valuation type or what are the process and movement type.So that material should be displayed in stock at damage valuation .

 

And how to cost analysis of damage material.

 

Thanks

Regards

Gaurav Solanki

Re: BAPI- K_SRULE_SAVE_UTASK

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We tried all possible things but with no success. Finally decided to go for BAPI: K_SRULE_SAVE_UTASK followed by the BDC for the save part.

Npw closing the thread, thankyou all for you replies.

 

 

Regards,

Asheesh Aswal


Transaction CM01

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Would like to know from you guys if you are able to EXCLUDE the work centers that do not have any capacity in viewing transaction CM01?

 

if YES, how do we achieve this?

 

 

Regards,

 

Nazarene

Re: Need User Manual of Refurbishment process

$
0
0

This area you have queried is usually like a grey area, in the no-serial number situation. Had it been serial number case, then, when it is dismantled through IE4N it is moved to store with Damaged (C3) valuation type. We are talking about the no-serial situation. In this case different companies could adopt different methods convenient to them. At our place we do not have any Financial impacts (because we have opted for Zero value for both Damaged and Repaired spares) for whatever practice we adopt for this. So our people use MIGO Goods receipt 202 to create a Defective version of the material at the Source storage location. (For this another option can be mvtTyp 501, but due to some reasons we do not use it) From here they send to the Refurbishment Storage location through MB1B (311). Then the Repairing agency takes it to Order through MB11 (261).

 

Regards

KJogeswaraRao

Re: Transaction CM01

$
0
0

Hello Nazarene,

That's not possible. Work centers with zero capacities also display output with all zeroes. But what is the issue where we query for one Work center at a time?

 

Regards

KJogeswaraRao

Re: Transaction CM01

$
0
0

Hello Nazarene,

 

As pointed out by Mr. Rao, it shouldn't be a problem since it gives you the output for each Work Center.

But only if you know for which work centers to run this for, you have an option to select those through Planning->Selection->Work center... and then you click on "Select indv wrk cntr" where you can select work centers for which you need to run this planning report.

 

Not sure of this is relevant to your requirement...but just thought to share this option...

 

Thanks

 

Saurabh

 


what are existing applications in FIORI for plant maintenance?

$
0
0

HI

I need information about existing applications in fiori for plant maintenance,

please share the details.

 

Thanks & regards,

Sudheer

Re: Limiting the catalogs for particular plant section

$
0
0

Sir,

 

While creating notification, we wanted to show catalogs only meant for that particular technical object.

However system was showing all the available catalogs.

 

It was due to that Catalog profile of that particular technical object was not assigned with any of the catalogs and code groups.

 

I hope it clears my question.

 

Thanks

Vivek

Re: want to restrict release of some order types by some specific user id

$
0
0

Hi Sameer,

 

Auth. Object I_VORG_ORD - PM: Business Operation for Order

Business Transaction field name: BETRVORG

Value: BFRE(Release)

 

The above object will give you the option of providing auth. based on Order Types.

 

Moreover, may be you can also think of creating a custom table with Order Type and User ID and maintain the Order Type / user ID combinations of users who are not allowed to release the orders.

 

Then you can make a check in user exit IWO10002 for this table and prevent the users from releasing the orders.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Thanks.

 

Saurabh.


How to get the GOS objects attachments plant wise

$
0
0

Hi Friends,

 

As we have SRGBTBREL table by passing object type i could able to get all the WO's ,notifications and equipment's attachment list however how to sort it out based on plant in details i would like to have each plant consisting of how many work orders with attachments

could you please provide your inputs/suggestions.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Srinika

Re: Limiting the catalogs for particular plant section

$
0
0

You mean to say that the catalog profile is empty without any code groups (OQN6)? IF yes, why discuss Catalog profile ? It is the only way for your requirement.

Re: want to restrict release of some order types by some specific user id

$
0
0

First let me agree that the object suggested by Saurabh (I_VORG_ORD) is better option.


Now follow this

PFCG > Give role name > Click on change icon .

Autorizations tab > click on

 

IF your Role has got IW32 in the Transactions list of Menu tab, then the Object is already present at the place shown here.

1.JPG

Give the Order types in the AUART field and the BFRE in the BETRVORG .  If by any reason your Role is not having this Object, then you can get it by clicking on the Selection Criteria tab shown above.

 

Thus this role becomes a tool to allow people to Release Order.  This you will not assign to the persons who should not Release Orders. Also ensure that these persons are not already enabled to Release the Orders through other Roles.

 

For example:

If you already have a role assigned to 100 users which enables all to Release Orders. Then you do not want to give Release authorization to 2 persons. Then you need to make a separate role for these two persons where there won't be BFRE in the above shown object. After making this you will remove the previous role and assign this new role to these 2 persons.

 

Actually due to above difficulties, the user-exit way becomes easier. We mention these userIDs in the exit and throw error when they try to release Order.

 

 

 

Regards

KJogeswaraRao

Updation of Asset masterdata.

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

My requirement is:

I want to update the date of audit and location of Asset in asset master data on every year. Some one could you please help me with T-code and procedure to update the date. if there is any other option also please let me know.

 

Thank you
Renjith. NK

Re: need help to read all operation when creating order

$
0
0

Amit,

 

1.Try the fm CO_BO_OPR_OF_ORDER_GET which gives operations at runtime.

 

2. When you talk about checks. IF I assume you are using a user-exit such as IWO10009 which stops at SAVE if the checks are not met then, you can retrieve the operations through field symbols also. Sample codes are here : Restrict Operation changes after Order Release (user exit IWO10009) You can see here (in both codes), we have collected the Operation information into internal table I_AFVG.

 

Hope this helps

Regards

KJogeswaraRao

Viewing all 10043 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>