Hello Jogeswara Rao Sir,
Please help.
Regards,
Smart Kumar
Hello Jogeswara Rao Sir,
Please help.
Regards,
Smart Kumar
Hi,
was going through this forum for a solution on a requirement as below:
I need a validation such that a user would not be allowed to NOCO a notification of a particular type (say for example M2 notification type) unless Cause is populated. But if the user tries just saving the notification it should allow. Only when user tries NOCO it should throw error.
Can you please help with solution?
I tried the configuration route by making VIQMUR-URGRP required with activity category 'V' and notification type 'M2' . But this does not help since the required setting is affecting all the notification types.
Thanks In advance.
Regards
Shanmugasundaram
Hello Smart,
If the requirement is:
'Prevent overlap between the durations of Basic Start and End Date any two work orders' then I'll try to derive the solution. (For solution I do not see any involvement of Capacity Leveling.)
Regards
KJogeswaraRao
Hello Jogeswara.
Very useful set of links. Thank you.
M
Thank you for the good advices!
M.
Dear Jogeswara
Thanks for the solution. Would test and get back.
Regards
Shanmugasundaram R
Hi Rao Sir.
On more confusion kindly suggest...Suppose I have a spare part X which is already installed in equipment when this X spare part goes in breakdown and feel that we can do refurbish of this X.
Then the confusion is that how to move that spare part in stock at damaged valuation type or what are the process and movement type.So that material should be displayed in stock at damage valuation .
And how to cost analysis of damage material.
Thanks
Regards
Gaurav Solanki
Hi All,
We tried all possible things but with no success. Finally decided to go for BAPI: K_SRULE_SAVE_UTASK followed by the BDC for the save part.
Npw closing the thread, thankyou all for you replies.
Regards,
Asheesh Aswal
Hi,
Would like to know from you guys if you are able to EXCLUDE the work centers that do not have any capacity in viewing transaction CM01?
if YES, how do we achieve this?
Regards,
Nazarene
This area you have queried is usually like a grey area, in the no-serial number situation. Had it been serial number case, then, when it is dismantled through IE4N it is moved to store with Damaged (C3) valuation type. We are talking about the no-serial situation. In this case different companies could adopt different methods convenient to them. At our place we do not have any Financial impacts (because we have opted for Zero value for both Damaged and Repaired spares) for whatever practice we adopt for this. So our people use MIGO Goods receipt 202 to create a Defective version of the material at the Source storage location. (For this another option can be mvtTyp 501, but due to some reasons we do not use it) From here they send to the Refurbishment Storage location through MB1B (311). Then the Repairing agency takes it to Order through MB11 (261).
Regards
KJogeswaraRao
Hello Nazarene,
That's not possible. Work centers with zero capacities also display output with all zeroes. But what is the issue where we query for one Work center at a time?
Regards
KJogeswaraRao
Hello Nazarene,
As pointed out by Mr. Rao, it shouldn't be a problem since it gives you the output for each Work Center.
But only if you know for which work centers to run this for, you have an option to select those through Planning->Selection->Work center... and then you click on "Select indv wrk cntr" where you can select work centers for which you need to run this planning report.
Not sure of this is relevant to your requirement...but just thought to share this option...
Thanks
Saurabh
HI
I need information about existing applications in fiori for plant maintenance,
please share the details.
Thanks & regards,
Sudheer
Sir,
While creating notification, we wanted to show catalogs only meant for that particular technical object.
However system was showing all the available catalogs.
It was due to that Catalog profile of that particular technical object was not assigned with any of the catalogs and code groups.
I hope it clears my question.
Thanks
Vivek
Hi Sameer,
Auth. Object I_VORG_ORD - PM: Business Operation for Order
Business Transaction field name: BETRVORG
Value: BFRE(Release)
The above object will give you the option of providing auth. based on Order Types.
Moreover, may be you can also think of creating a custom table with Order Type and User ID and maintain the Order Type / user ID combinations of users who are not allowed to release the orders.
Then you can make a check in user exit IWO10002 for this table and prevent the users from releasing the orders.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Saurabh.
Hi Friends,
As we have SRGBTBREL table by passing object type i could able to get all the WO's ,notifications and equipment's attachment list however how to sort it out based on plant in details i would like to have each plant consisting of how many work orders with attachments
could you please provide your inputs/suggestions.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinika
You mean to say that the catalog profile is empty without any code groups (OQN6)? IF yes, why discuss Catalog profile ? It is the only way for your requirement.
First let me agree that the object suggested by Saurabh (I_VORG_ORD) is better option.
Now follow this
PFCG > Give role name > Click on change icon .
IF your Role has got IW32 in the Transactions list of Menu tab, then the Object is already present at the place shown here.
Give the Order types in the AUART field and the BFRE in the BETRVORG . If by any reason your Role is not having this Object, then you can get it by clicking on the Selection Criteria tab shown above.
Thus this role becomes a tool to allow people to Release Order. This you will not assign to the persons who should not Release Orders. Also ensure that these persons are not already enabled to Release the Orders through other Roles.
For example:
If you already have a role assigned to 100 users which enables all to Release Orders. Then you do not want to give Release authorization to 2 persons. Then you need to make a separate role for these two persons where there won't be BFRE in the above shown object. After making this you will remove the previous role and assign this new role to these 2 persons.
Actually due to above difficulties, the user-exit way becomes easier. We mention these userIDs in the exit and throw error when they try to release Order.
Regards
KJogeswaraRao
Hi Experts,
My requirement is:
I want to update the date of audit and location of Asset in asset master data on every year. Some one could you please help me with T-code and procedure to update the date. if there is any other option also please let me know.
Thank you
Renjith. NK
Amit,
1.Try the fm CO_BO_OPR_OF_ORDER_GET which gives operations at runtime.
2. When you talk about checks. IF I assume you are using a user-exit such as IWO10009 which stops at SAVE if the checks are not met then, you can retrieve the operations through field symbols also. Sample codes are here : Restrict Operation changes after Order Release (user exit IWO10009) You can see here (in both codes), we have collected the Operation information into internal table I_AFVG.
Hope this helps
Regards
KJogeswaraRao