Hi Savas,
I jave just created OSS to SAP (medium priority).
I will inform what was the proble, & solution.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi Savas,
I jave just created OSS to SAP (medium priority).
I will inform what was the proble, & solution.
Cheers,
Daniel
Go in MPLA, put your plan number and get OBJNR, pass this in to table JCDS
From JCDS get STAT and pass this in to TJ02T with SPRAS = EN for English.
You will get status on Plan.
Remember, the status shall be a multiple responses depending on the object status, maintenance plan creation or deletion flag.
Shiv,
What formulae do you have assigned to the PP work center (IR02, tab "Capacities")?
Paul
Hi,
Can you check how your data looks like in : Display Converted Data
Should look like
1.Please check that IDENT1 and IDENT2 are defined correctly
for exemple SRC_IBIPTLST:
IDENT1 | PLNAL | KTEXT | WERKS | VERWE | STATU | STRAT |
1 | 1 | header1 | 1000 | 4 | 4 | A |
for exemple SRC_IBIPTLOP:
IDENT1 | IDENT2 | VORNR | ARBPL | STEUS | WERKS | LTXA1 | ARBEI | ARBEH | ANZZL |
1 | 1 | 0010 | MECHANIK | PM01 | 1000 | operation A exemple | 4 | HR | 2 |
1 | 2 | 0020 | MECHANIK | PM01 | 1000 | operation B exemple | 4 | HR | 2 |
1 | 3 | 0030 | MECHANIK | PM01 | 1000 | operation C exemple | 4 | HR | 2 |
2. Please make sure the size of field SRC_IBIPTLOP-STEUS is CHAR4
3.if this is General Task list then read this General Task List Upload on LSMW with Document (DMS) by Direct Input method
You need to change the value from IA01 to IA015 in table SXDA3
Regards
Ziv
Hello,
I tested same there is always the same problem,
Regards,
Hi Experts;
I have checked the SCN knowledge base and could not found any satisfactory answer so putting this query.
We have a requirement for Customer service regarding Warranty. Client manufactures the make to order equipment and uses the parts in it by procurement from various vendors. Client will give Warranty for whole equipment but the parts procured from vendor; the warranty received from vendor passed to customer as it is.
Being more specific;
Pump would be sold as equipment and motor would be procured from vendor and warranty given by motor manufacturer would be passed to customer.
I need to understand how we will configure it in SAP.
Thanks in advance!
Regards;
Avinash
Hi Sine,
You have another alternative which I recommend you - the IBIP Tool ,
Step 1
- Download the template from here :
Step 2
Enable macro in the Excel
Step 3
Fill the required data
Step 4
You can edit the template by using the edit option "IBIP Template mapping" --> edit
select the required structure and then check or uncheck the required fields - when completed press on the button " Edit IBIP template"
Step 5
Press on the "excel to SAP" button - text will be opened , save the flat file at any folder
Step 6
Goto transaction IBIP and - goto tab " File Management" , select the flat file from previous step and press F8
See attached the flat file generated from this template - you can try to upload it in IDES for testing
Good luck,
Ziv
Thanks All fro the valuable inputs.
Is it ok to use the Planning indicator in the control tab of the maintenance Order to solve this?
Eg:
Planning indicator is defaulted as "Unplanned" for order type and after all operations are entered, manually change the Planning indicator to "Planned"
What is the standard use of this Planning indicator?
Asohk M
For your package 3, remove the cycle length and add the 35 days as the Offset amount.
From SAP Help:
You must maintain an offset when you want to create a one-time package or one-time cycle, for example, in the case of a first inspection. In this case you should not enter a cycle duration.
Paul
Yes, ihave checked these notes and they are not applicable forthe latest version of ECC we are running. 960263 is applicable for the application version 600 and we are on617.
The other note is not applicable for ECC 600.
Hi Ketul,
I suggest you can to raise OSS note to SAP.
Regards
Terence
Dear All PM Guru's
I have created the maintenance plan with the following details.
Cycle: 1 month
Call Horizon: 80%
Scheduling Period : 365 days
Start of Cycle: 30/12/2014
Scheduling indicator: Time-Key date.
After scheduling plan scheduling overview list is as below
1 | 01/30/2015 | New start Save to call | ||
2 | 02/28/2015 | Scheduled Save to call | ||
3 | 03/28/2015 | Scheduled Save to call | ||
4 | 04/28/2015 | Scheduled Save to call | ||
5 | 05/28/2015 | Scheduled Save to call | ||
6 | 06/28/2015 | 06/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold | |
7 | 07/28/2015 | 07/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold | |
8 | 08/28/2015 | 08/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold | |
9 | 09/28/2015 | 09/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold | |
10 | 10/28/2015 | 10/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold | |
11 | 11/28/2015 | 11/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold |
12 | 12/28/2015 | 12/22/2015 | Scheduled Hold | |
13 | 01/28/2016 | 01/22/2016 | Scheduled Hold | |
14 | 02/28/2016 | 02/22/2016 | Scheduled Hold | |
15 | 03/28/2016 | 03/22/2016 | Scheduled Hold | |
16 | 04/28/2016 | 04/22/2016 | Scheduled Hold | |
17 | 05/28/2016 | 05/22/2016 | Scheduled Hold |
The according to plan the first call is generated on 01/30/2015, second call is generated on 02/28/2015 coz February month will not be having 30th date.
My question is on from third to last call why system is generating call object on 28th day.
Please help me on this.
Regards
Kiran Ambi
Hello Gurus,
During MIGO, a new serial number (let’s say serial number 002) will be entered for a material (let say mat01) coming from the vendor. This is like a replacement serial number to the material already sent to the vendor (serial number 001). Now the requirement is to check if it is possible to assign the same equipment record to the replacement serial number (as assigned to the 001 to 002). As far as i have investigated it doesn’t seem to be possible in standard. A new equipment record needs to be created for replacement serial number 002. Approach then is to update the corresponding warranty details in this new equipment record like the existing one for serial number 001.
Can you please throw some light on this? Your Observation/Solution will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and Kind Regards
Mohan
Yes Terence,
We did that yesterday and have got a response to the same. As anticipated by us, SAP has put in restrictions at IP10 to avoid performance issues in the dialog mode. Plans with more than 99 items can be scheduled via IP30 or using the program RISTRA20.
This was a good learning and thought sharing with the group. Thanks for the responses.
Regards,
Ketul Odich
Hi Kiran,
I feel this is because of your scheduling indicator time - key date
As per the logic, system will pick the date exactly the date which you enter in start of cycle.
For Ex. 30.12.2014, my next planned date is 30.01.2015, but for feburary it is only 28 days, so system will pick 28.02.2015 and then it will continue scheduling with the same date.
If you want exactly 30 days to be captured, then you need to use scheduling indicator Time.
Regards
Terence
Thanks for sharing the resolution Ketul. Appreciated.
Hi
Try IE02 - Edit - Special Ser. No Functions - Change Serial No
Cheers
Savas
Sir, if we go for developmet of report can u suggest mw how to proceed regarding the input to developers, if you had done already can u share screen of it.
QM13