What item category are you using?
PeteA
↧
Re: Error IW822 - when I try to create maint Order from IW81 - Refurbishment Order
↧
Re: How close n notifications by IW32 (TECO order) pop-up?
Bruno,
Or update all notifications after the breakdown data has been entered in the 1st notification. TECOing of the order is then done in a 2nd step.
PeteA
↧
↧
Re: Error IW822 - when I try to create maint Order from IW81 - Refurbishment Order
Hi,
Goto the Navigation path
SPRO-->PM/CS-->MAINTENANE & SERVICE PROCESSING-->MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE ORDERS-->GENERAL DATA-->DEFINE DEFAULT VALUES OF COMPONENT ITEM CATEGORIES
check what is the Default Item category determined for the Material type, it should be L
regards,
santosh
↧
Re: Order triggered on Completion
Hello Pete,
I tried setting it to '0' and '999' but still get the same error. The TECO date window of 30 days i guess is influenced by the Reference date (01/12/2014 in the previous reply screen shot) which would be the TECO date of the previous order. Are you aware of the setting for this to be over ridden?
As long as this date will not impact the future planned dates and not let the PM create, confirm or TECO I am okay with this because it makes sense for the PM to be TECO'd around the system current date and not more than 30 days in the past or the future. Please comment.
Thanks
Sid
Start in the Past setting as '0' & '999'. There was no difference in the Planned dates, Call dates and Completion Dates.
Plan start date: 09/22/13
Call num: 1: First order: BSD: 12/21/13 & BFD: 03/21/2014
| Call num | Planned Date | Call Date | Completion Date |
| 1 | 12/21/2013 | ||
| 2 | 3/21/2014 | 12/21/2013 | |
| 3 | 6/19/2014 | 3/21/2014 | |
| 4 | 9/17/2014 | 6/19/2014 | |
| 5 | 12/16/2014 | 9/17/2014 | |
| 6 | 3/16/2015 | 12/16/2014 | |
| 7 | 6/14/2015 | 3/16/2015 | |
| 8 | 9/12/2015 | 6/14/2015 | |
| 9 | 12/11/2015 | 9/12/2015 |
After scheduling once the first order was TECO'd with 01/11/2014
Call num : 2: Second Order: BSD:01/12/2014 & BFD:04/11/2014
| Call num | Planned Date | Call Date | Completion Date |
| 1 | 12/21/2013 | 1/11/2014 | |
| 2 | 4/11/2014 | ||
| 3 | 7/10/2014 | 4/11/2014 | |
| 4 | 10/8/2014 | 7/10/2014 | |
| 5 | 1/6/2015 | 10/8/2014 | |
| 6 | 4/6/2015 | 1/6/2015 | |
| 7 | 7/5/2015 | 4/6/2015 | |
| 8 | 10/3/2015 | 7/5/2015 |
↧
Re: PM Order View profile
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your assistance.
The "Old" - Basic view, displayes the Ref Obj for existing orders as follows, where the Floc is larger than 30 characters:
The ... indicate the value is longer than the display field as seen when the cursor hovers over the value.
The New View Profile displays the Ref Obj for existing orders where the Floc is larger than 30 characters, as follows:
The Floc value is truncated. In Edit mode. The system obviously does not recognise the "Truncated" floc value therefore, we are unable to update these Orders.
This DOES NOT occur when we create new orders using the New View Profile. In this case the Ref Obj is displayed correctly for 40 characters.
Hope this is clear.
Please let me know if you need more info.
Phil
↧
↧
Re: PM Order View profile
I have also tried to re-select the Ref Obj for the existing order Even thought the 40 character Floc is available for selection, once selected, only the first 30 characters is inserted into the floc field and the validation still fails.
↧
Re: reverting the system status of the WO
Hi,
It is not possible to reverse the function 'Do not execute'. This can only be performed on non-released orders. In that situation it is usually possible to replace the order with a new one.
Note 1617855 explains how execution of this function can be prevented.
-Paul
↧
Error in IW32
Hi All,
One WBS element is assigned to a maintenance order( PM module).That maintenance order is having planned cost and some actual cost.The order is released mode.Now when user wants to do any change ,it is throughing error message that "an error occurred during budget check,please check cost protocol"(message no IW172). But in PS report,there is available budget against the WBS element.Responsible person assigned in WBS element is found to be ok.
Please find below budget value of the WBS element.
Budgeted value = 2,011,974.65
Assigned Value=1,911,936.78
Available budget=100,037.87
Actual cost of maintenance order =7,471.83
Also, in maintenance order ,planned cost is showing as 1,491,537.47 under t-code IW32 t-code.
Now if i want change any material qty even reducing the qty, it is giving that error message & rejecting save.System initially allowed to save the maintenance order.Why is it not now? Does system check budget against planned cost of order?
rgds
↧
Re: Order triggered on Completion
Hello Pete,
Message: IW586.
Example:
BSD: 9/23/2013
BFD: 12/21/2013
Sy Date: 01/15/2014
Acceptable Reference dates 08/24/2013 to 02/14/2014. Calculated upto 30 before BSD and 30 days after BFD and Sy Date. If the Sy Date is past the BFD the reference date will be the Sy date and the 30 day calculation is fronm the Sy Date.
Looks like it is standard SAP delivered. However there are opportunity for implicit enhancements. I will check with the Business and if they need more than 30 days I will work on it.
Thank you for your assistance.
Regards
Sid
FORM ADDAT_CHECK USING HEADER LIKE CAUFVD
P_IND_NO_MESSAGE_SEND TYPE C
CHANGING C_OUT_OF_INTERVAL TYPE C."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""$"$\SE:(90) Form ADDAT_CHECK, Start A
DATA: L_DAT_LOW LIKE AFIH-ADDAT.
DATA: L_ADDAT_MINUS30 LIKE AFIH-ADDAT.
DATA: L_ADDAT_PLUS30 LIKE AFIH-ADDAT.
DATA: L_OUT_OF_INTERVAL.
IF HEADER-ERDAT < HEADER-GSTRP.
L_DAT_LOW = HEADER-ERDAT.
ELSE.
L_DAT_LOW = HEADER-GSTRP.
ENDIF.
* prüfen ob ADDAT mehr als 30 Tage von Anlegedatum/Startdatum entfernt
L_ADDAT_PLUS30 = SY-DATLO + 30.
IF HEADER-ADDAT > L_ADDAT_PLUS30.
L_OUT_OF_INTERVAL = 'X'. " :[
ENDIF.
IF L_OUT_OF_INTERVAL = 'X'
AND P_IND_NO_MESSAGE_SEND = ' '.
CALL FUNCTION 'CMOR_T160M_READ'
EXPORTING
I_ARBGB = 'IW'
I_MSGNR = '586'
I_MSGVS = SPACE
IMPORTING
E_MSGTP = SY-MSGTY
EXCEPTIONS
NOT_FOUND = 1.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 1 AND
NOT SY-MSGTY IS INITIAL.
MESSAGE ID 'IW' TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER 586.
IF 0 = 1. MESSAGE I586(IW). ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
↧
↧
Re: SAP PM order without equipment number
Thanks all for the response. Appreciate it!
↧
FM EAM_TASKLIST_GET_DETAIL to get Task List Data is giving an error
Good day pros 
I need your help regarding the FM : EAM_TASKLIST_GET_DETAIL
I passed the Key Group No : 1 and task list type A and its raising an exception (Task list A 00001 is not hierarchical), any idea? nothing is mentioned in the the FM documentation
Regards
↧
Gantt Chart for multiple production orders
Hello Experts,
Can someone tell me how I can display a gantt chart with multiple production orders based on all the POs for a particular production supervisor or group?
I know to get gantt chart for one individual prod order, I go to CO02 and "goto" tab on the menu and "graphics" and then "gantt chart". But that is only for a single order.
How do we get one for multiple orders? And how do we get the data in there that it needs to accurately compute these schedules?
↧
Re: PM Order View profile
Hi Peter,
I used that Icon to toggle between the "basic view profile" and the "new view profile" to generate the two images above.
↧
↧
Re: PM Order View profile
You can however only use that icon in "Display" mode. In "Change" Mode, the system starts off with the "New View Profile" and data validation is done before it changes to the "Basic View Profile". This generates an error message that "The F/Loc does not exist"
↧
Re: Gantt Chart for multiple production orders
Hi Megha
I believe you are on the worng group. This is EAM forum. You better raise this question to PP forum which is here: http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/manufacturing-pp
Cheers
Savas
↧
Re: Gantt Chart for multiple production orders
Oh. Appreciate your response. Thanks Savas.
↧
Scheduling of plans with Multiple Item
Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue, I had created Plans with Multiple, items each item is having different task list following is the example of packages assign.
6m 1yr 2yr 5yr
Item A X X
Item B X X X
Item C X X
So if I am scheduling for Start in Cycle for 1 year its Creating Work order for Item B and Item C.
So my Question is It Should Generate Work Order for Item A after 1 year as its 6 Month is due.
Same if I am scheduling for Start in Cycle for 2 year its Creating Work order for Item A and Item B.
So my Question is It Should Generate Work Order for Item C after 2 years its 1 year is due.
So I considered that Plans is not Considering Individual Item and as per higher hierarchy in strategy. In this case to get a correct result I changed my Task list for above as
6m 1yr 2yr 5yr
Item A X X X
Item B X X X
Item C X X X
Is it correct method or there is another way to handle this scenario.
Thanks & Regards
Kamlesh
↧
↧
Re: Scheduling of plans with Multiple Item
Hi,
As per your requirement use maintenance strategy for maintenance plan and assign from task list with packages i.e. 6M,1Y,2Y, etc. and tick on operation check box in task list.
So, I think there is not required multiple item.
↧
Re: IP19- Graphic Scheduling Overview and Simulation# Issue.
Dear All,
Good Day,
In Transaction !P19, When I Click at RED Color icon( On Hold Order)
Its not asking me below option..
Release call
Skip call
Deactivate maintenance plan
Set deletion flag
What could be the reason ?
Regards
Kamlesh
↧
Re: Scheduling of plans with Multiple Item
HI Akhilesh,
Thanks for reply
There are three Equipment associated with each other and with there own tasklist. I create single plan as order for 3 equipments should come together. That's why I created 3 items in plan for each equipment.
So i should tick all the packages for Item A, B & C ie. i.e. 6M,1Y,2Y. That;s your suggestion ?
↧