Thanks for Correction, which is in right direction
I was using AFKO for different purpose.
In my reply mention of AFKO table was not relevant and hence redundant.
As far as your observation about AFIH and VIAUFK, it is dependent upon the developer what all fields he wants.
As you said use of VIAUFKS will increase possibilites of various fields availability because it is a view (join of several tables).
As I mentioned in my first reply, it all depends on the Functional Specifications.
As per our requirement, we've got the report (pictures attached)
Anand, I feel you've got enough inputs. Now it is your turn to take this thread in the direction you want.
Jogeswara Rao K